Active Urbanism: Heart rate and oxygen consumption comparison when walking on imitation stepping stones versus a plain surface

Share

Target audience

City authorities, urban designers, landscape architects

The problem

The range and variety of movement has been and is being eliminated from urban environments. These are often designed for lowest level of agility and ability, even where there is enough space to provide other more challenging options. A lack of opportunities and nudging of people to exercise as a separate activity from everyday walking is leading to inactivity pandemic resulting in cardio-respiratory problems.

What we did and why

To bridge the gap between physiological theory and the application in urban design, we designed a combination experiment. This included 26 participants walking on a plain treadmill in a laboratory, and then stepping stone imitations at the same speed. Physiological data was collected and compared using a heart rate monitor and a breath-by-breath metabolic system. This was supplemented by a questionnaire about body reactions and likelihood to perform a similar exercise in a life situation.

Our study’s contribution

This study adds a new criteria to consider designing urban landscapes. It supportes opportunities and encouragement for ‘moderate exercise’ (increasing breathing and heart rate) to help make the population healthier.

Impacts for city policy and practice

New criteria can be applied through adding steppingstones to public realm, creating adventurous landscapes in parks and boulevards, without affecting accessibility. We must reconsider the balance between risk of falling now; and health deterioration over years.

Further information

Anna Boldina – Active urbanism research and design: Landscape design research encouraging physical activity

Full research article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Improvements to urban planning and public policy: Lessons from the responses COVID-19 in Ghana

The global COVID-19 pandemic, with its associated issues of isolation, enhanced hygiene practices and contact tracing brought up a number of issues to the public domain, many of which bordered on the nexus between urban planning and public health. We examine how new ideas concerning the linkages between urban planning and public health revealed by the COVID-19 crisis can be integrated into practice and how we might leverage this knowledge to build more just, healthier and liveable cities.

Read More »