City Know-hows
Target audience
Policy-makers, planners, developers, academics
The problem
Australia’s housing context has long been characterised by low-rise detached homes, but rapid population growth has prompted a recent boom in apartment construction. Apartment residents may be more vulnerable to the negative impacts of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders due to the distinct constraints and stressors of apartment housing, but empirical research on this population is scarce.
What we did and why
Our study adds to the literature on the health impacts of lockdowns by examining longitudinal changes in the health behaviours of Australian apartment residents. Participants (n=159) completed a survey between 2017-2019 and a follow-up survey in 2020 following a six-week national lockdown.
Our study’s contribution
Our results demonstrated that behaviours were both positively and negatively impacted. Residents reported increased walking for recreation, sleep duration, and home cooking frequency, but also reported decreased walking for transport and greater sitting time. Similarly, weight/BMI also increased.
An important strength of this study is the longitudinal examination of a cohort of apartment residents using data collected pre- and post- mandatory stay-at-home orders. Moreover, our study does not focus on a single outcome, but a wide range of health and lifestyle behaviours.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Given the likelihood of future pandemics, a renewed policy focus on apartment space and layout provisions that better facilitate home-based activity is required to mitigate the health risks of lockdown conditions for those living in apartments.
The findings underscore the importance of understanding the specific impact of the pandemic on different populations, including apartment residents, to inform public health policies and interventions.
Further information
Full research article:
Boxed in: changes in apartment residents’ health behaviours following the COVID-19 lockdown – a longitudinal cohort study by Alexandra Kleeman & Sarah Foster
Related posts
I diagnose urbanization’s toll: 60% of city dwellers face stress-related morbidity, which biophilic design aims to curb; yet my 100-study review reveals biophobia’s backlash, like glare spiking cortisol 10%. This dialectic, rooted in evolutionary and urban disconnect, exacerbates health inequities e.g., 30% higher stress in underserved areas —demanding my evidence-based, Hegelian synthesis to recalibrate architecture for resilience.
Health has turned into a number one priority in the present city context (e.g. lower emissions, active transportation, sustainable farming). By integrating it with proximity measures (as in the 15-minute city), we can create even healthier cities. Here is how they do it around the globe.
Our findings revealed that despite the limited play destinations compared to the local child population, children’s outdoor play experiences are predominantly positive. This positive outlook is attributed to their sense of safety within familiar spaces and strong social ties with neighbours beyond their immediate families. Key contributing factors include the proximity of schools and play areas to residential locations, the strategic placement of playgrounds along home-to-school routes, and the hierarchical relationship among neighbourhood open spaces.
