Case Studies

Case Study Mockup: Developing a Pedestrian Plan for a Healthy Hospital in Gothenburg

Case Context and Problem

Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Northern Europe’s largest healthcare facility, is located in Gothenburg, Sweden, adjacent to a National Reserve and botanical gardens. The hospital serves 700,000 residents and specializes in advanced medical care. However, the campus faces critical challenges: spatial inequities caused by a car-dominated urban design, urban heat islands exacerbated by sealed surfaces, frequent rainwater runoff due to climate change, and biodiversity loss from insufficient green infrastructure. These issues disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, such as children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities.

Spatial Interventions Objectives

The primary objective is to create a regenerative urban landscape that mitigates environmental stressors while improving walkability, accessibility, and health outcomes for vulnerable groups. Specific goals include:

  • Enhancing pedestrian connectivity by redesigning pathways and entrances.
  • Increasing green and blue elements to reduce urban heat islands and promote biodiversity.
  • Managing rainwater runoff through porous materials and sustainable drainage systems.

Methodology

The study employed the UrbanCare research framework, combining field studies, stakeholder workshops, and environmental diagnostics. Key steps included:

  1. Identifying critical pedestrian zones and mapping spatial inequities.
  2. Measuring heat retention and surface porosity using advanced materials analysis.
  3. Conducting biotope ratio assessments to evaluate green space coverage.
  4. Evaluating street-level needs for vulnerable populations through on-site surveys.

Key Results and Lessons Learned

The study revealed significant barriers to walkability, including disconnected pedestrian zones and unsheltered parking lots. Urban heat spots increase cooling energy consumption by 19% and pose serious health risks during heatwaves. Rainwater runoff was found to escalate flooding risks and raise water treatment costs, while biodiversity loss impaired air quality and ecological balance. These findings stress the importance of integrated, nature-based solutions to address these interconnected issues effectively.

Limitations

The study faced limitations in acquiring long-term climate data for predictive modeling and comprehensive user feedback due to time constraints. Additionally, budgetary and administrative barriers hindered immediate implementation of proposed interventions.

Implications for Practice

This case study underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing urban health challenges. Planners and policymakers should prioritize pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and climate-resilient designs to improve health outcomes and urban sustainability.

Visual Evidence

Conclusion

The full case study includes detailed findings on pedestrian barriers, environmental stressors, and proposed regenerative strategies. It highlights methodologies like biotope ratio assessments and heat mapping, alongside stakeholder-driven solutions for improving urban health at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

Learn more about this case study at: https://www.buildinghealth.eu/a-healthy-hospital-in-gothenburg/

Contributors

Research: Alvaro Valera Sosa (Building Health Lab) and Göran Lindahl (Chalmers University of Technology)
Contributors: Netra Naik and Anna Au from Building Health Lab

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

A psychology and power intervention to help decision-makers prioritise health in ­­­urban development

Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation. This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.

Read More »

A city in need: Analyzing the ongoing dilemma of open defecation in Delhi

Unveiling the hidden truth behind open defecation in Delhi, this study exposes the role of infrastructural incapacity and institutional failure. With 80% of surveyed households’ still practicing open defecation, the findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive policies to address the inadequacy of public and household facilities, water availability, and coordination among governmental bodies.

Read More »