City Know-hows

Challenges and paradigms to evaluate the relationship of urban environments with population health

Hong Kong, view from Lion Rock, 2018. Photo: Andrea Salmi.

Evidence and data are not widely used to plan healthier cities through urban planning. Indeed research has not produced an extensive standardised assessment able to engage the transdisciplinary nature of the relationship between population health and urban settings.

Our study introduces and reviews how the built environment and its relation to population health are assessed in the literature. We did this by identifying methodological shortcomings and research potentials that need to be addressed jointly. Our assessment aims to undertake multiple health issues in an integrated manner, and identify priorities within the city whereby health is a primary goal.

Share

Target audience

Public health officers, city planning officers and large organization or institution that can coordinate multiple actors or access to broad datasets.

The problem

While we want to shape cities to be healthier, data and evidence are not widely used to support health integration of health in planning. Indeed, research in urban health fields did not produce yet a standardised approach to assess urban environments concerning its multiple impacts on health jointly, despite the latter are commonly accepted.

What we did and why

We focussed on the diagnosis of the city since an essential step to integrate health in planning. We introduce and review protocols of assessment in scientific studies about the relationship between urban environments and population health, to identify limitation, shortcomings and potentiality to be addressed together and finally drive broad assessment to support healthier interventions. The aim is to undertake multiple health issues jointly, identify priorities within the city and undertake health as a primary goal.

Our study’s contribution

Adequate appraisal of cities could allow the identification of priorities with equity within the city and display conflicts and synergies among urban health issues, as well as between alternative solutions. The evaluation of the urban forms is not detangled by health measurements which can generate new solution adapted to local exigencies and also monitor the effectiveness of interventions. However, precise data and approaches are needed to contextualise how urban environments influence health.

Impacts for city policy and practice

Acknowledge the complex nature of urban health should not lead to inaction but rather a transdisciplinary effort to integrate health in the process of planning. Therefore it is crucial to understand how and where urban characteristic brings health benefits or hazards. This article gathers gaps and potentials to be addressed by transdisciplinary agents that could benefit from adequate extensive assessment of the healthiness of the urban environments.

Further information

Full research article:

Related posts

The Emerald Isle or a Green Desert? Gardens as sites for city greening 

To create cities where both nature and humans thrive, the research outlines how city gardens are interconnected with the surrounding countryside and coast. A hands-on approach is needed to bring more nature into gardens through combining disciplines such as 1) environmental psychologists (unearthing different types of gardeners) 2) the horticultural industry (the know-how) and 3) the marketing/advertising industry (the storytellers). Aggregated actions of domestic gardeners could help policy-makers push for improved biodiversity restoration.

Read More »
A wooden planter with some flowers in the middle of a residential street. On the front is a green sign saying 'ROAD OPEN TO', followed by icons representing an adult holding a child's hand, a person on a push scooter, a person using a wheelchair, a bicycle.

Walking and wheeling in Low Traffic Neighbourhoods: A mixed methods study of the impact of schemes on disabled people’s journeys

Low Traffic Neighbourhoods are being introduced in UK cities to reduce motorised through-traffic in residential areas, create better conditions for walking, wheeling and cycling, and change the hierarchy of uses in public spaces. Existing evidence shows that schemes work and generate important public health benefits. However, the experiences of disabled people with these schemes have yet to be explored. This is important because public space and the built environment are important facilitators and barriers in the lives of disabled people.

Read More »

Shared mobility as a mean to tackle transport poverty in deprived neighbourhoods

Shared mobility hubs that offer (electric) bikes and cars can be a sustainable solution that enables people to expand their mobility options while protecting cities’ environment by reducing private car use and encouraging cycling. We interviewed residents of a deprived neighbourhood in Utrecht, the Netherlands, to understand their mobility needs and views on a recently implemented shared mobility hub in their neighbourhood, identifying potential obstacles in the process.

Read More »