Menu
City Know-hows
Target audience
Local housing policymakers, policymakers interested in measuring community well-being and developers of multi-unit residential buildings.
The problem
Community well-being in the built environment is ‘greater than the sum of its parts’. However, methods have not caught up to demonstrate this in terms of evidence-based approaches. In practice, evaluation methods and frameworks are reductive, measuring community well-being as an aggregate of factors of individual well-being. They operate as a kind of ‘pick and mix’ of dimensions and indicators. As such, they are ill-suited to reflect value in an appropriate way when used to inform planning policy and practice that seeks to improve community well-being.
What we did and why
We aligned the concept of community well-being with current building performance assessment methods. For our approach, we integrated a Social Practice Theory lens to understand the interaction between community factors and features of the built environment. Social Practice Theory being a psychological approach that seeks to determine the link between practice and context in ‘on the ground’ implementation.
Our study’s contribution
In terms of analysis, we advocate participatory mixed methods to integrate community wellbeing theory into current assessment methods. Our example supports the development of a novel, evidence based tool for assessing community well-being in the built environment. We recommend improvements to community wellbeing assessment based on our own research, including participatory methods, local community engagement, and use of Photovoice.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Implications for city policy and practice: Our findings offer the following contributions to city policy and practice:
We review seven frameworks for community well-being in the built environment to identify gaps between theory and methodology
We recommend of participatory mixed-methods to address identified gaps
We illustrate how a Social Practice Theory lens allows us to conceive the concept of well-being as an emergent property for planning that is shared, and temporally and geographically bounded.
Further information
Not available.
Full research article:
Community wellbeing in the built environment: towards a relational building assessment by Norene Lach, Sarah McDonald, Sylvia Coleman, Marianne Touchie, John Robinson, Garrett Morgan, Blake Poland and Alstan Jakubiec.
Related posts
We examine how caregiving-related needs remain overlooked in walkability and Transit-Oriented Development strategies. Despite high levels of urban complexity, many transit-accessible areas lack essential caregiving-support places, particularly in vulnerable neighbourhoods. This spatial mismatch limits care-engaged individuals’ ability to chain trips, and access services, reinforcing mobility and social inequities. Our research highlights the need to integrate caregiving accessibility into planning frameworks to ensure that walkable cities are also inclusive and care-supportive.
How will COVID19 change our relationship with public space and the future of city design? We outline the key ways in which city planning and the design of public space may change as a result of the COVID19 pandemic.
Building place attachment and sense of community through design can improve community well-being, yet reviews on this topic are lacking. This manuscript presents a systematic review of the links between pedestrian designs and place attachment and sense of community, and also highlights several health equity considerations to encourage new ideas about inclusive and healthy urban design practice and study.
