City Know-hows

How do we make sustainable and healthy diets acceptable, appealing, and appropriate in local settings?

Danish fish market. Photo by Nick Karvounis on Unsplash

Target audience

Those in charge of Copenhagen’s food strategy and food strategies in other cities worldwide. International and national food NGOs. Public health food practitioners.

The problem

Poor diets are both the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, while also being a key driver of climate change. While efforts have been made to design a global diet that is good for both people and planet (the Eat-Lancet reference diet), this diet does not take into account different eating norms in different places nor how they might affect uptake.

What we did and why

To understand how people in one Copenhagen neighbourhood navigated their food environments and explore the implications for bringing diets in line with the Eat-Lancet reference diet, we designed a photo-elicitation study. Over three weeks, participants took photos of their food environments and the facilitators and barriers to healthy eating. They attended workshops where they discussed these photos and reflected on how a healthy and sustainable diet might be facilitated.

Our study’s contribution

  • Insights into the different factors that shape people’s food purchasing and consumption and how they interact with each other.
  • Insights into how the food environment might need to be adapted so that foods that fit in with a healthy and sustainable diet are affordable, appealing, and accessible.
  • Insights that are grounded in the lived experiences and critical reflections of people living and eating in one neighbourhood of Copenhagen.

Impacts for city policy and practice

Adapting the Eat-Lancet reference diet to local circumstances  requires a deep understanding of how and where people acquire food, and what other roles food plays in people’s lives. To reshape diets, what is available in the food environment must match what fits in with pre-existing practices and values.

Policy makers must understand the non-monetary benefits that food environments bring to people, such as providing time for other activities or promoting broader wellbeing through social engagement.

Further information

Full research article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Active Urbanism: Heart rate and oxygen consumption comparison when walking on imitation stepping stones versus a plain surface

This study measured the effectiveness of stepping stones as an element of landscape design – to make walking a more effective form of exercise for health. The average increase in heart rate due to steppingstones was 17.22%. In conclusion, we estimate that stepping stones can significantly increase peoples metabolic and physiological parameters, and can help the wider population to achieve the recommended government and health guidelines of ‘moderate exercise’ of 150 min/week, improving population health. This new evidence can help designers to implement ‘Active Urbanism’ strategies.

Read More »

Urban health policy ideas in planning Sydney’s Western Parkland City

Seven key urban health policy ideas were found in the planning of Sydney’s Western Parkland City that draw upon different ontological perspectives. This case study prompts policy actors and researchers to reflect on their own assumptions, and others’ underlying assumptions to better understand where and how collaborations should occur.

Read More »