Insights on behaviour changes, the pandemic, and the Sustainable Development Goals in Hong Kong

Masked Hong Kongers in Wan Chai District during the pandemic in 2020. Source credit: Photo by Alison Pang on Unsplash

Share

Target audience

Researchers and scholars studying behavior shifts due to a global pressure, in this case, a pandemic, in relation to sustainability in the city; City policymakers working towards innovative post-pandemic strategies and interventions to achieve the SDGs.

The problem

Cities pursue ways to integrate sustainability into their development plans. The pandemic, despite its miseries and sufferings, was touted as an opportunity to achieve the SDGs. Yet, we know little how pandemic-induced lifestyle changes and resulting behavioral shifts facilitate or hinder the fulfilment of the SDGs. We also know little whether these changes are temporary, driven solely by necessity and whether individuals will revert to pre-pandemic behaviors once the crisis subsides.

What we did and why

We extensively reviewed 208 media and academic sources published from March 2020 to July 2021 to correlate behavioral shifts with the SDGs and ranked 75 SDG sub-targets in the context of Hong Kong during the pandemic using Saaty’s Analytical Hierarchy Process.

Our study’s contribution

We found that four SDGs emerged as prominent in Hong Kong: SDG3 (Good Health and Wellbeing), SDG8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG1 (No Poverty), and SDG10 (Reduced Inequalities). Our findings reflect the significant impacts of the pandemic on these goals, especially on public health, the economy, and vulnerable communities in Hong Kong.

Impacts for city policy and practice

Our analysis provides a crucial framework for devising post-pandemic strategies to achieve Hong Kong’s SDG targets. It also offers valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders involved in Hong Kong’s sustainable development efforts. In particular, freedom of movement allowed and curtailed by city policy changed behaviours suggesting their primary significance in nudging sustainability behaviors. However, these policies also inadvertently impacted behaviors related to mental health, leading to increased suicide rates, particularly among the youth. City policy and practice, thus, could advocate more for human well-being, especially in the context of mental health.

Further information

Full research article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

How can indicators support planning for healthier and more resilient cities?

As emerging challenges have made urban areas increasingly vulnerable, jeopardizing the health and well-being of their inhabitants, resilience should be seen as a pathway for healthy cities and integrated into urban planning practices. This study shows if and how existing indicator frameworks can identify urban systemic vulnerabilities and priorities for resilience building to provide local authorities with evidence crucial in planning for healthy and resilient cities.

Read More »