Target audience

Professionals working on urban resilience and urban planning. Vector-borne and mosquito-borne disease control actors.

The problem

Urbanisation is increasing the risk of mosquito-borne diseases like dengue and malaria, which have a major impact on health and development. While cities worldwide are investing in urban resilience initiatives, we do not know to what extent and how mosquito-borne diseases are being considered in resilience planning.

What we did and why

We conducted a multi-site case study, focusing on Resilient City Network member cities Chennai (India), Paynesville (Liberia) and Medellín (Colombia), to understand the intersection between vector-borne diseases and city resilience. We conducted in-depth interviews with resilience representatives of each city to explore perceptions of mosquito-borne diseases, their prioritisation in resilience planning and what resilience activities are being implemented and how. Interviews were supplemented with document review of City Resilience Strategies and related policy documents.

Our study’s contribution

This study shows that while mosquito-borne diseases are not considered explicitly as a resilience challenge, many resilience activities that cities are already doing have co-benefits for mosquito-borne disease control or could be enhanced to realise this potential.

Impacts for city policy and practice

We suggest four key recommendations for cities looking to integrate mosquito-borne disease control into their resilience approach:

  • Raise awareness of the links between city resilience and mosquito-borne diseases

  • Develop multi-sectoral collaborations with co-benefits for mosquito-borne disease prevention and control

  • Increase inclusivity in urban planning to protect vulnerable groups from mosquito-borne diseases and other challenges to health and wellbeing

  • Engage with communities to implement mosquito-borne disease control and resilience initiatives

Further information

Resilient Cities Network: This network brings together over 200 Chief Resilience Officers, partners, practitioners, and researchers for a common goal of urban resilience. They define urban resilience as the capacity of a city’s systems, businesses, institutions, communities, and individuals to survive, adapt, and thrive, no matter what chronic stresses and acute shocks they experience.

Commonwealth Local Government Forum – Healthy Cities Healthy People campaign: This was launched in 2021. It is a joint initiative with the Roll Back Malaria Partnership, UN Habitat, Uniting to Combat NTDs and BOVA (Build Out Vector Borne Disease in Africa). 

Full research article:

Integrating city resilience and mosquito-borne diseases – a multi-site case study from the Resilient Cities Network by Beatrice R Egid, Marcela Herrera Jaramillo, Thomas C Lindsay, Clara Isabel Lopez Villegas, Krishna Mohan, Kim Ozano, Raul Alberto Rojo Ospina, Carlos Alberto Sarria Ocampo, Bindu Taylor-Brewer, Carlos Andrés Villarreal Restrepo, Lina Liakou and Anne L Wilson.

Related posts

Opportunities and challenges of using mobile phone data for evaluating placed-based interventions: A green space pilot

There is limited evaluation of whether green space interventions lead to more people using these spaces. This is partly due to the difficulty of collecting data on visits to green spaces. Mobile phone data may offer one solution, but are rarely made available to researchers. As such, there is less examination of whether these data are valuable. We accessed small area anonymised mobile phone GPS data for Liverpool (2021-2022). Using a case study of wildflower planting, we identified green spaces where wildflowers were planted. A synthetic control was then constructed to identify similar green spaces where planting did not take place. We then compared the number of visits post-intervention between the intervention and control green sites. Our paper also gives an empirical and methodological evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of using mobile phone data, which can inform others on how to best use them.

Read More »

Bio-reconciliation: Dialectics for healthier, equitable urban futures – Biophilia and Biophobia

I diagnose urbanization’s toll: 60% of city dwellers face stress-related morbidity, which biophilic design aims to curb; yet my 100-study review reveals biophobia’s backlash, like glare spiking cortisol 10%. This dialectic, rooted in evolutionary and urban disconnect, exacerbates health inequities e.g., 30% higher stress in underserved areas —demanding my evidence-based, Hegelian synthesis to recalibrate architecture for resilience.

Read More »