City Know-hows

Public acceptability of takeaway management zones near schools

Planning policies can be used to stop new takeaway food outlets from opening, which could prevent scenes of multiple outlets in a single location. Photo by Jake Colling on Unsplash

Who supports proposals to manage if, when and where new takeaways can open near schools? According to our recent study,over 50% of adults living in Great Britain!

Share

Target audience

Planning professionals working in practice, Local government elected politicians, National policy makers

The problem

Global trends indicate that takeaway food is commonly accessible in neighbourhood food environments. Local governments in England can use spatial planning to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in “takeaway management zones around schools” (known elsewhere as “exclusion zones”).

What we did and why

The adoption of takeaway management zones near schools has been advocated for internationally, and some local authorities in England have done so. However, there remains scope for further adoption. Public support for population health interventions, and the extent to which these are viewed as effective at achieving their stated aims can influence political will for adoption. We analysed data from the International Food Policy Study to investigate public acceptability of takeaway management zones around schools.

Our study’s contribution

Our findings focus on what adults living in Great Britain think about takeaway management zones around schools.
• More than half supported proposals, and less than one in ten were against them.
• Most reported that these zones would help people to eat better.
• They typically agreed that fewer takeaways near schools would allow healthier food outlets to open, schools to promote healthy food and mean that young people ate takeaway food less often.

Impacts for city policy and practice

High levels of public acceptability for takeaway management zones around schools, especially in terms of support for adoption can reassure policy makers that proposals would not receive substantial public disapproval. Policy makers should not, therefore, use limited public support to rationalise policy inertia.
Planning professionals can use our findings to support their future proposals.

Further information

Full research article:

Public acceptability of proposals to manage new takeaway food outlets near schools: cross-sectional analysis of the 2021 international food policy study by Matthew Keeble, Jean Adams, Ben Amies-Cull, Michael Chang, Steven Cummins, Daniel Derbyshire, David Hammond, Suzan Hassan, Bochu Liu, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Oliver Mytton, John Rahilly, Nina Rogers, Bea Savory, Richard Smith, Claire Thompson, Christine M. White, Martin White & Thomas Burgoine.

Related posts

Unlocking food access in rural Jordan: Evaluating land use regulations in Annuaymeh village

Through field observations, surveys with the residents, and interviews with decision-maker, we identified key variables that define food access in rural areas in Jordan, mapped access to food services according to the identified variable. and assessed food access in relation to land use regulations. Our work investigated frameworks governing the allocation of food service establishment locations, spatial requirements, integration into city masterplans, equitable distribution of food service types, and pertinent legislative frameworks.

Read More »

Challenges and paradigms to evaluate the relationship of urban environments with population health

Our study introduces and reviews how the built environment and its relation to population health are assessed in the literature. We did this by identifying methodological shortcomings and research potentials that need to be addressed jointly. Our assessment aims to undertake multiple health issues in an integrated manner, and identify priorities within the city whereby health is a primary goal.

Read More »