Menu
City Know-hows
Who supports proposals to manage if, when and where new takeaways can open near schools? According to our recent study,over 50% of adults living in Great Britain!
Share
Target audience
Planning professionals working in practice, Local government elected politicians, National policy makers
The problem
Global trends indicate that takeaway food is commonly accessible in neighbourhood food environments. Local governments in England can use spatial planning to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in “takeaway management zones around schools” (known elsewhere as “exclusion zones”).
What we did and why
The adoption of takeaway management zones near schools has been advocated for internationally, and some local authorities in England have done so. However, there remains scope for further adoption. Public support for population health interventions, and the extent to which these are viewed as effective at achieving their stated aims can influence political will for adoption. We analysed data from the International Food Policy Study to investigate public acceptability of takeaway management zones around schools.
Our study’s contribution
Our findings focus on what adults living in Great Britain think about takeaway management zones around schools.
• More than half supported proposals, and less than one in ten were against them.
• Most reported that these zones would help people to eat better.
• They typically agreed that fewer takeaways near schools would allow healthier food outlets to open, schools to promote healthy food and mean that young people ate takeaway food less often.
Impacts for city policy and practice
High levels of public acceptability for takeaway management zones around schools, especially in terms of support for adoption can reassure policy makers that proposals would not receive substantial public disapproval. Policy makers should not, therefore, use limited public support to rationalise policy inertia.
Planning professionals can use our findings to support their future proposals.
Further information
Full research article:
Public acceptability of proposals to manage new takeaway food outlets near schools: cross-sectional analysis of the 2021 international food policy study by Matthew Keeble, Jean Adams, Ben Amies-Cull, Michael Chang, Steven Cummins, Daniel Derbyshire, David Hammond, Suzan Hassan, Bochu Liu, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Oliver Mytton, John Rahilly, Nina Rogers, Bea Savory, Richard Smith, Claire Thompson, Christine M. White, Martin White & Thomas Burgoine.
Related posts
This street matrix tool can be used by urban planners and other built professionals both to plan new streetscapes and also to assess exisiting streetscapes for improvement. Currently, in many global contexts, it is good practice to make areas accessible for all and complete street audits. Despite this, without background knowledge of visual impairment and other disabilities, it can be difficult to assess these challenges and provide adequate solutions. This street matrix makes this more accessible and easy to assess these areas.
I diagnose urbanization’s toll: 60% of city dwellers face stress-related morbidity, which biophilic design aims to curb; yet my 100-study review reveals biophobia’s backlash, like glare spiking cortisol 10%. This dialectic, rooted in evolutionary and urban disconnect, exacerbates health inequities e.g., 30% higher stress in underserved areas —demanding my evidence-based, Hegelian synthesis to recalibrate architecture for resilience.
Australian pilot study finds a Healthy Urban Transition Tool can assess the liveability of urban environments and assist in transitioning neighborhoods towards improving the social determinants of health and health equity.
