Target audience

Professionals working on new development (e.g. architects, sustainability consultants, engineers, urban designers, etc.) planners and public health teams.

The problem

The design of built spaces affects health. Research has focused primarily on healthy planning policy development rather than implementation in the process of urban development. There is a knowledge gap about the specific problems encountered by design teams when they seek to create healthy buildings and places, including the solutions that they have adopted to overcome such challenges.

What we did and why

To explore professionals’ experiences of creating healthy development projects, we interviewed 31 built environment and public health practitioners in six countries (Australia, China, England, Netherlands, Sweden and the USA). We asked participants to tell us about a project in which they had tried to integrate health and wellbeing design measures, talking us through the background, motivation, people involved, challenges they encountered and opportunities to overcome those.

Our study’s contribution

Using the participants’ descriptions, we classified developers into two general categories about their willingness to design for health.

We found three key themes that related to integrating health into new buildings and communities. Managing risk, responsibility and economic constraints were paramount to persuade developers to adopt healthy design measures. Participants could push business-as-usual practices towards healthy urbanism by showing economic benefits or piloting new approaches. Finally, building knowledge and capacity across professionals and the public will support healthier development.

Impacts for city policy and practice

There are important lessons for urban design teams, policy-makers and practitioners.

  • Design team professionals should understand and manage developers’ risks to integrate health into new urban development. To do so, they need to match developers’ needs with evidence about the health and financial benefits that are created through specific design measures.
  • Policy-makers should consider the full range of incentives for healthy development, including landownership transfer and the potential for collaborative action.
  • Practitioners may benefit from further support through knowledge sharing networks and training for inclusive design process.

Further information

Additional information and resources at healthyurbanism.net

Full research article:

Related posts

Uncovering the evidence base of the COVID-19 pandemic in informal settlements

In informal settlements, the impact of COVID-19 can be alarmingly severe due to the lack/limited access to infrastructure, densely populated living conditions, and pre-existing socio-economic inequalities. There are limited studies that synthesise evidence from the literature on the COVID-19 lived experiences of informal settlement dwellers, often overlooked in scientific studies and policy-making initiatives. There any knowledge gaps that require further research to enhance the development of context-specific policies towards effective pandemic planning and response. How can we build resilience and sustainable livelihoods in informal settlements during public health emergencies?

Read More »