City Know-hows
City makers need to stop making cities for ‘normal’ circumstances. Cities are liveable only when they can respond and reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change.
Share
Target audience
City-makers and urban policymakers
The problem
The Covid-19 Pandemic revealed the deficiency of the current planning systems in coping with disturbances and the inability of cities to maintain their level of liveability during the time of crises. Traditional interpretations of liveability tend to emphasise the quality of life, health and wellbeing of communities under ‘normal’ circumstances, and disregard the impacts of unexpected shocks and disturbances on cities.
What we did and why
The research focused on understanding the interface between the concepts of liveability and resiliency. The question for this paper is: ‘How can we plan liveable cities that are resilient to shocks, such as the Covid-19 pandemic?’
Our study’s contribution
The research highlighted the importance of integrating the concept of resiliency into liveability to develop cities that can sustain their liveability over time, specifically when disruptions happen. Cities need to increase their capacity to not only absorb shocks and respond quickly, but also, reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change. We need urban policies and plans that enable cities to adapt, survive and thrive and maintain the quality of life, health and wellbeing of citizens during and after crises.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Urban planning and policy needs to address the institutionalised inequities built into our cities through ‘local living’. Planning sustained liveable cities also requires to:
• Be ‘people centred’
• Apply ‘Integrated long-term planning’,
• Be ‘responsive and adaptable’,
• Ensure ‘future-proofing’
• Promote ‘sustainable development’
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Public parks shape how people meet, stay, and interact. This study shows how specific physical features of an urban park influence everyday social life, offering practical lessons for designing public spaces that support social interaction, wellbeing, and inclusive urban vitality. We combined on-site observation of people’s behaviour with surveys of park users and spatial analysis. We did this to move beyond abstract design principles and provide evidence-based insights into how seating, pathways, land use, inclusiveness, and safety shape everyday social interactions in public spaces.
Urban planning significantly impacts public health, yet health considerations are often overlooked in city development strategies. Climate change further exacerbates urban health risks, particularly in vulnerable regions. Despite growing recognition of the link between urban planning and health, cities lack structured methodologies to quantify and integrate health-related data into policy. Without systematic approach, cities struggle to identify disparities, allocate resources effectively, and create health-resilient urban environments. Addressing this gap is critical for sustainable urban development.
We propose a replicable spatial framework applied at the small geographic scale in Pisa, Italy, to address a methodological gap. We find that both CVI and density predict excess mortality, providing an essential tool for health equity planning.
