Menu
City Know-hows
Seven key urban health policy ideas were found in the planning of Sydney’s Western Parkland City that draw upon different ontological perspectives. This case study prompts policy actors and researchers to reflect on their own assumptions, and others’ underlying assumptions to better understand where and how collaborations should occur.
Share
Target audience
City officers, urban planners, and urban health researchers.
The problem
Policy actors often fail to challenge their own assumptions about their policy ideas or recognise that these views may not be shared with others. This lack of reflexivity can reinforce implicit biases, leading to ineffective policies, incoherent policy ideas, lack of collaboration, confusion, and distrust.
What we did and why
We examined the foundational assumptions underpinning key urban health policy ideas within the planning of the Western Parkland City in Sydney, Australia. This analysis aims to foster a comprehensive understanding among policy actors, encouraging effective engagement in transdisciplinary collaborations.
Our study’s contribution
Our research reveals that the urban health policy ideas are informed by diverse ontological perspectives, transcending specific sector-based knowledge. This case study highlights the complexity and diversity of ontological perspectives that shapes urban health policy ideas in real-world urban planning policymaking.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Acknowledging both the similarities and differences in how actors perceive urban health policy ideas is critical in fostering a transdisciplinary approach to promote health through urban planning. Emphasising coherence rather than consensus in problem definition, goal setting, and implementing solutions is essential for effective transdisciplinary urban policy development.
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Public health has historically been an important factor driving urban planning policy in England but is currently rarely a priority. We explore the factors behind this, try to explain them in the context of policy developments since COVID-19, and consider what needs to change at national policy level to support healthier placemaking in the future.
City makers need to stop making cities for ‘normal’ circumstances. Cities are liveable only when they can respond and reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change.City makers, policy makers
Our Jerusalem Railway Park study addressed the needs of those aged 55 in disparate communities, with long-term implications for physical and mental health, and community
