Menu
City Know-hows
Providing access to greenspace is insufficient in ensuring that positive benefits are realised. Critical characteristics may distinguish between those spaces that encourage people to visit them and those that are uninviting. This article provides a case study of a residential urban extension in one of the UK’s ‘Healthy New Towns’.
Share
Target audience
City planning officers; urban designers; public health professionals; developers; community organisations.
The problem
Access to greenspace is widely recognised as a key tool to improve health and wellbeing and enhance the resilience of urban ecosystems. Actual provision of neighbourhood greenspace in England remains a challenge because greenspace is becoming increasingly comprised both in terms of quantity and quality due to the pressures of development and lack of maintenance due to costs to local authorities under a regime of government-imposed budget cuts.
What we did and why
Our study involved a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews with residents of a new urban extension to a town developed as part of the UK Government’s ‘Healthy New Town’ programme that aimed to create new homes located in well planned, healthy communities, with plenty of access to green spaces. The survey and interviews identified respondents’ levels of use and satisfaction with different types of greenspace provision and the perceived impact on personal health and wellbeing.
Our study’s contribution
We reveal the characteristics of residents’ use and experience of different types of neighbourhood greenspace and how this is perceived to affect health and wellbeing. Our study highlights that providing access to greenspace is not enough to ensure that positive benefits are realised and that critical characteristics of greenspace should be considered above and beyond proximity. We provide key recommendations for maximising the health and wellbeing benefits of urban greenspace based on our empirical findings.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Our research suggests that simply providing access to greenspace within a development is unlikely to maximise positive health and wellbeing outcomes unless it inherits the necessary characteristics to attract users and encourage health-enhancing activities. Attention should be given to access within greenspace and providing a variety of greenspace provision. Suitable measures should be put into place to ensure that greenspaces are well-maintained in perpetuity.
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Health arguments are rarely used to justify urban policies in Latin America. A new urban health study suggests we can and should do better connecting
This comparative study of 10 cities across the globe aims to understand the major factors that drive the sprawl conditions and their impact on the outer edges of the cities. Land is a very potential natural resource that has been exploited over the past few decades. Migration of people in search of better living conditions has led to the formation of cities, which are deemed to provide better quality of life. However, the rate of influx has become very high, leading to saturation in cities and forcing people to move towards the outskirts.
Public spaces in universities target skateboarding through hostile architecture and security. Hostile designs exclude skateboarding as a novel form of physical activity. Maybe ‘just’ urban design guidelines can produce more inclusive and diverse public campus spaces.
