City Know-hows

Water infrastructure failures have impacts beyond human health

City of Flint, Michigan main water plant and tower. © Greg Rybarczyk

Target audience

American Planning Association, Eastern Great Lakes Chapter of the Association of American Geographers, Association of American Geographers, Michigan Association of Planning, Crim Fitness Foundation, Genesee County Land Bank, The City of Flint Planning Department.

The problem

The literature on migration in developing nations indicates that poor quality infrastructure is a “push” factor because people leave places that cannot provide water or other basic services. It is conceivable that the same phenomenon could occur in the U.S. as infrastructure deteriorates. This issue has not yet received a lot of attention in the academic literature or mainstream media; however water systems in the U.S. are now just reaching the point where they are old and failing.

What we did and why

While several studies have examined the health effects of the crisis and changes in water lead levels over time, no study has considered whether the crisis has resulted or could result in residents leaving the city. To explore this question, we surveyed 405 Flint residents and used quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as exploratory spatial data analysis, to test five hypotheses about the water crisis and population dynamics.

Our study’s contribution

Our study shows the potential for a negative cyclic  relationship between failures in infrastructure provision and population loss. While population losses have not yet accelerated, we found that many residents of Flint, Michigan are considering leaving the city because of a water crisis. If a large proportion of residents leave, the quality of the city’s infrastructure will further erode as the tax base continues to decline. We found that perceptions of the water’s safety and its long-term health effects—rather than sociodemographic variables or actual water lead levels—predict whether a resident considers leaving. Further, resident responses did not vary by demographics or home location—meaning that policy makers cannot target retention initiatives to one group or section of the city.

The study adds to the paucity of work on the relationships between water infrastructure and population dynamics. Although it uses empirical analyses and a case study approach focused on the Flint, Michigan water crisis, the findings have wider implications.

Impacts for city policy and practice

Flint may be one of the first cities in the U.S. to experience a man-made, catastrophic water infrastructure failure on a large scale. It is conceivable that other legacy/shrinking cities could face similar challenges as their infrastructure ages and is not maintained due to financial constraints stemming from deindustrialization. This study emphasizes how disinvestment in water infrastructure has implications for community development,,  cities’ long-term financial health, and ultimately their sustainability. We argue that it is important for planners and policy makers to be aware of the public’s perception of infrastructure quality.

Further information

Full research article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

How can indicators support planning for healthier and more resilient cities?

As emerging challenges have made urban areas increasingly vulnerable, jeopardizing the health and well-being of their inhabitants, resilience should be seen as a pathway for healthy cities and integrated into urban planning practices. This study shows if and how existing indicator frameworks can identify urban systemic vulnerabilities and priorities for resilience building to provide local authorities with evidence crucial in planning for healthy and resilient cities.

Read More »